Mazda CX 5 is one of the best selling models, and along with smaller SUVs like the styling-focused -3 has proven to be a big hit. They are all similar but meet different expectations. However, if you need clarification about which one fits your needs better than others, knowing the similarities and differences between both vehicles is essential. This article will thoroughly review both to determine the real deal.
Design and Size
The dimensions and genre of these Mazdas’ events differ dramatically. That’s because it fits between the compact CX 3 and the compact Mazda CX 5. As you would expect, this translates into differences in interior space, cargo capacity, and overall dimensions.
The interior of the CX 5 is roomy and has plenty of seats for passengers and junk in the trunk. A well-appointed, modern design is matched by flowing lines and an assertive grille to enable a smooth ride that benefits from ample legroom and headroom. Its roomier cargo bay makes it a better option for hauling more oversized items and heading on an extended trip.
On the other hand, Mazda’s smaller CX-3 is more city—and parking-friendly. The overall design has shrunk in scale, and as it was well executed before. The CX-3 also has less cargo space than the slightly larger CX-5, which is bad news for people who need to carry a lot of commuter cars across their state.
Performance and Handling
Regarding performance, the Mazda CX 5 and CX-3 offer plenty of zoom-zoom behind their respective Mazda engineering wheels. Although they are different sizes and have different engine options, they perform the same.
The Mazda CX 5 is offered with a pair of engines from the factory. Meanwhile, the CX 3 is motivated by a 2.0-litre, four-cylinder powertrain, which provides an invigorating performance that works best around town. Though it doesn’t have the same power as its CX 5 sibling, this smaller size helps make for a nimbler and more agile drive. It was meant to be a hoot around tight city streets and winding roads.
Interior and Features
Mazda took some time to ensure the interiors of both models were also high-quality and well-thought-out. Unsurprisingly, the Mazda CX 5 is larger inside and feels more premium. This means higher-quality materials, more advanced technology features, and additional comfort amenities. Standard features on the CX-5 include a touchscreen infotainment system, a rearview camera, and advanced safety technology. Premium 2020 Audi A3 models get leather upholstery and a premium sound system; higher trims add on to that with things like heated front seats.
The insides of the CX-3 are alright, too: quality materials are used throughout, and it has a more well-integrated infotainment package. Every Forte gets a touchscreen interface, a rearview camera, and Bluetooth connectivity. While not having some of the premium features of a CX-5, the interior design is new and spacious for those who need practicality and good looks.
Safety and Technology
Mazda prioritizes safety in both models, including numerous safety features. This makes sense, as the CX-5 is generally pricier and more significant than average for a compact crossover. Automatic emergency braking, adaptive cruise control, and lane departure warning are standard features available elsewhere to give drivers even more confidence.
The CX-3 also has a full safety-feature set, though some advanced tech may only be found on higher-trim levels or options. Standard safety features include a rearview camera, a blind spot monitor, and a cross-traffic alert. Though it lacks all the high-level systems within so many CX-5s, the smaller model still delivers a reassuring level of safety and driver assistance!
Fuel Efficiency
For fuel economy, generally, the Mazda CX 5 is more efficient than its smaller sibling, thanks to added size and engine choices. The base engine in the CX-5 is on target for its class, and though there are both faster engines and thriftier ones available from competitors up against Mazda’s turbocharged take-back to diesel defiance because of that additional oomph, admittedly, while adding a bit more “less” where it comes, when you look at performance over EPA numbers.
The CX-3 is smaller and lighter, so its fuel economy figures are generally higher. This 2.0-liter engine is perfect for urban commuters, with a city-optimized fuel economy that works wonders for those perpetually stuck in traffic on roads. Depending on your driving habits and what appeals to you more, that difference in fuel efficiency could be a factor.
Conclusion
Should you ever want a Mazda CX 3 over the more extensive, faster, and more, the Mazda CX 5 delivers extra cargo capacity, amenities, and a more comprehensive and more luxurious driving experience. It offers a larger footprint and more powerful engine choices, making it perfect for those shopping for an SUV with immense comfort and utility.
The Mazda CX 3, on the other hand, represents a compact and nimble alternative that still offers sporty looks and performance but with a slightly smaller footprint. This makes it ideal for city driving or those who don’t require anything larger. It will be pretty economical, too, thanks to its efficiency-optimized engine, which makes quick work of urban environments and daily commutes. Mazda says both models embody driving joy and beautiful quality.